Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 19:38:50 GMT -8
In the social investigation report made about the plaintiff mother, it was reported that there was no situation preventing the mother from assuming the custody duty. According to this situation; The fact that the common child stays with the defendant father, who does not actually fulfill the requirements of the custody duty, does not show interest in the child and uses drugs for a long time, has a negative impact on his physical and psychological development, and the positive contributions that the siblings' living together will provide to their development and, if the best interest of the child requires, their views. , while the case should be accepted within the framework of the above-mentioned principles and the decision to change the custody of the common child in question was made,
it was not correct to make a written decision on the France Telegram Number Data grounds that it could not be determined that the father had used drugs recently, and it required reversal. In the social investigation report made about the plaintiff mother, it was reported that there was no situation preventing the mother from assuming the custody duty. According to this situation; The fact that the common child stays with the defendant father, who does not actually fulfill the requirements of the custody duty, does not show interest in the child and uses drugs for a long time, has a negative impact on his physical and psychological development, and the positive contributions that the siblings' living together will provide to their development and, if the best interest of the child requires, their views.
Considering that the opposite could be decided, while the case should be accepted within the framework of the above-mentioned principles and the decision to change the custody of the common child in question was made, it was not correct to make a written decision on the grounds that it could not be determined that the father had used drugs recently, and it required reversal.
it was not correct to make a written decision on the France Telegram Number Data grounds that it could not be determined that the father had used drugs recently, and it required reversal. In the social investigation report made about the plaintiff mother, it was reported that there was no situation preventing the mother from assuming the custody duty. According to this situation; The fact that the common child stays with the defendant father, who does not actually fulfill the requirements of the custody duty, does not show interest in the child and uses drugs for a long time, has a negative impact on his physical and psychological development, and the positive contributions that the siblings' living together will provide to their development and, if the best interest of the child requires, their views.
Considering that the opposite could be decided, while the case should be accepted within the framework of the above-mentioned principles and the decision to change the custody of the common child in question was made, it was not correct to make a written decision on the grounds that it could not be determined that the father had used drugs recently, and it required reversal.